Difference between revisions of "TDIS DAQ, 12 November 2020"
From Hall A Wiki
(→Minutes) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Back to [[Tagged DIS run group]] >> [[Tagged_DIS_run_group#DAQ_development_meetings|DAQ development Meetings]] | Back to [[Tagged DIS run group]] >> [[Tagged_DIS_run_group#DAQ_development_meetings|DAQ development Meetings]] | ||
− | [[TDIS DAQ, 15 October 2020|previous meeting]] << >> [[TDIS DAQ, | + | [[TDIS DAQ, 15 October 2020|previous meeting]] << >> [[TDIS DAQ, 10 December 2020|following meeting]] |
Latest revision as of 16:41, 9 December 2020
Back to Tagged DIS run group >> DAQ development Meetings
previous meeting << >> following meeting
Organizational details
- 1:00 PM
We will be using the BlueJeans system. To join via Phone:
- Dial: 1-888-240-2560 (US or Canada only); other access numbers are available from bluejeans.com/numbers
- Enter Conference ID: 550 654 514, and press #
To join through a browser: https://bluejeans.com/550654514
Agenda
- Updates
- E. Fuchey very first look on TDIS electron arm trigger logic
Minutes
Participants: David Flay, Eric, Jan, Simona, Paul King, Alexandre, Thia
- Brief updates:
- David --- no update
- Simona --- continuing to test PMTs, does not need DAQ support yet
- Jan --- no update
- Paul --- no update
- Eric
- Considering to use a 3 PMT coincidence for the trigger in the RICH, but backgrounds in the RICH would give too high an accidental coincidence
- Including alignment of hits in the RICH and LAC could bring accidentals to smaller rates
- But his study on slide 3 assumed the LAC is triggered in a single row. If the LAC triggering is done in groups of rows, this will be more spread out
- Some questions raised in discussion
- Could we use smaller grouping of PMTs in the RICH (clustering?) to help reduce the accidentals?
- How many pe's do we expect in the RICH?